Connecticut UM/UIM coverage: required at 25/50 minimum.

Why UM/UIM coverage matters in Connecticut

Uninsured-motorist (UM) and underinsured-motorist (UIM) coverage is the most important coverage a Connecticut driver can carry , and the most overlooked. Roughly one in eight U.S. drivers is uninsured, and many more carry only state-minimum liability that runs out well before catastrophic medical bills are paid. UM/UIM is the policy your own insurer sells you to fill that gap.

UM coverage is mandatory in Connecticut. The statutory minimum is 25/50 per the requirements of Conn. Gen. Stat. § 38a-336. Insurers must include the coverage in every policy issued or renewed in the state.

UIM coverage: when the at-fault driver has too little insurance

Connecticut UIM claims involve sequenced settlement: the plaintiff first exhausts the at-fault driver's liability coverage, then notifies their own UIM carrier of the underlying settlement, and (in most states) gives the UIM carrier a chance to "substitute" payment to preserve subrogation rights before accepting the settlement.

Stacking UM/UIM limits in Connecticut

UM stacking , the ability to combine UM coverage across multiple vehicles on the same policy or across multiple policies , is treated differently in every state. Connecticut's rule on stacking: allowed. Stacking dramatically increases available coverage in households with multiple insured vehicles.

Hit-and-run claims in Connecticut

A Connecticut hit-and-run victim turns to their UM coverage when the at-fault driver is unidentified. The policy typically requires either physical contact between the vehicles or independent corroborating evidence (eyewitness testimony, surveillance video) before a phantom-vehicle claim is paid.

The UM/UIM claim process in Connecticut

The standard Connecticut claim process treats the at-fault carrier as the first source of recovery. If that policy is inadequate, secondary sources include the plaintiff's own UM/UIM coverage, any applicable umbrella policies, and (in third-party-defendant cases) the assets of co-defendants. Each tier requires separate notice, separate documentation, and separate negotiation strategy. Missing a notice deadline on any tier can extinguish that source of recovery entirely.

Connecticut insurance carrier landscape for UM claims

Connecticut attorneys who specialize in personal-injury work track each carrier's tendencies. State Farm has historically been the most willing to settle clear-liability cases pre-suit; Allstate has historically been the most aggressive in disputing pain-and-suffering damages; Progressive has historically been the fastest to deny coverage on technical policy grounds. These patterns shift over time and across regions, but they shape the strategic decisions in every Connecticut case.

Evidence that wins Connecticut UM/UIM disputes

In Connecticut, the evidentiary burden in a contested personal-injury case is borne by the plaintiff. That practical reality drives the procedural strategy: secure medical records via written authorizations on day one, preserve physical evidence with chain-of-custody documentation, depose witnesses while memories are fresh, and use the formal discovery tools (interrogatories, requests for production, depositions) aggressively. Defendants in Connecticut routinely file motions for summary judgment based on evidentiary gaps; the plaintiff who has built a complete record from the start is the one who survives those motions.

Real-world Connecticut UM/UIM case patterns

Pattern: a Connecticut pedestrian is struck in a crosswalk by a delivery van whose driver was looking at a phone. The defendant carries the minimum Connecticut liability policy of $25,000. The plaintiff's UM/UIM coverage on their own policy is $300,000 stacked across three vehicles. The eventual recovery in such cases typically maxes out the defendant's liability and then taps the plaintiff's UIM for the balance, with a coordinated release between the two carriers to avoid coverage disputes.

Mistakes that reduce Connecticut UM/UIM recovery

Three avoidable errors recur in Connecticut personal-injury cases: settling the property-damage claim without coordinating release language, missing the pre-suit notice deadline for any government-defendant component of the case, and undervaluing future-medical damages because the plaintiff did not get a life-care plan or a vocational expert. Each of these errors can transform a high-value case into a low-value one.

Connecticut UM/UIM FAQ

Is UM coverage required in Connecticut?

Yes. Connecticut mandates UM coverage at a minimum of 25/50 under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 38a-336.

What is the difference between UM and UIM in Connecticut?

UM (uninsured motorist) pays when the at-fault driver has NO insurance. UIM (underinsured motorist) pays when the at-fault driver has SOME insurance but their limits are inadequate to cover your damages. Connecticut policies typically bundle the two together, though limits and exclusions can differ.

Can I stack UM coverage in Connecticut?

Yes , Connecticut permits stacking of UM limits across multiple insured vehicles on the same policy or across multiple policies.

What if the at-fault driver fled the scene?

UM coverage on your own policy applies to hit-and-run / phantom-vehicle scenarios in Connecticut, typically subject to physical-contact or independent-corroboration requirements set by your policy.

Do I need to notify my insurer before settling with the at-fault driver?

Yes. Almost every Connecticut UM/UIM policy requires written notice and consent before settling with the at-fault liability carrier. Settling without consent can void UM/UIM coverage by extinguishing the carrier\'s subrogation rights.

How long do I have to file a UM/UIM claim in Connecticut?

The policy itself sets the notice deadline (often "as soon as practicable" or 30-180 days). The underlying personal-injury SOL is 2 years under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-584, and most courts treat UM claims as contractual , meaning the contractual limitations period in the policy may also apply.

Related Connecticut topics