Statute of limitations · California

You have 2 years to file a personal-injury lawsuit in California.

The clock starts on the date of injury. The controlling statute is Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 335.1 (PI). Filing one day late dismisses the case with prejudice.

Verified 2026-05-16 Informational only

Estimate your case value

Real PACER-comparable cases, instant range. No phone gate.

Free
$0$250,000+
0% (your fault)100% (their fault)
ESTIMATED RANGE · CALIFORNIA

$8,800to$30,600

Range based on real PACER casesRun full AI evaluation

Find your state's deadline

Statute of limitations countdown for all 50 states.

50 states

Enter your accident date to see remaining days, the exact statute citation, and tolling exceptions.

Browse all 50 states

What the California statute of limitations actually says

If you were injured in California and intend to sue the at-fault party, the most important date on your calendar is the statute-of-limitations deadline. Nothing else matters if you cross it.

California's personal-injury deadline is 2 years from the date of injury (Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 335.1 (PI), § 340.5 (medmal)). Medical-malpractice claims run separately at 1 year, often with a discovery-rule trigger. Property-damage claims have a 3-year deadline.

The statute itself, Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 335.1 (PI), § 340.5 (medmal), is the controlling authority. Interpretive decisions come from CA Sup. Ct., which has repeatedly enforced the deadline against late-filed plaintiffs.

When does the clock start in California?

Accrual in California means the date you sustained the injury. The fact that you settled with the at-fault driver's insurer or filed a PIP claim does not extend the period. Only a proper civil complaint stops the clock.

Discovery rule

California courts recognize a "discovery rule" exception: the statute does not begin running until the plaintiff knew or reasonably should have known of the injury and its cause. This matters most in latent-injury cases like asbestos exposure, surgical sponge cases, or chemical poisoning.

What happens if you file late

The consequence of filing one day late is the same as filing one year late , total bar. California courts have repeatedly rejected "near miss" equitable arguments. If the deadline is two years and you file on day 731, the case is dead.

Exceptions that pause or restart the clock

Minors

Children injured in California get a tolling rule: the statute does not begin running until the minor reaches the age of majority. This means a five-year-old injured in a car accident generally has until age 18 + the standard SOL years to file.

Mental incapacity

California courts have recognized tolling for plaintiffs whose mental condition prevents them from understanding or pursuing their legal rights. The burden of proof is on the plaintiff. Temporary impairment after the accident, such as pain medication or short hospitalizations, does not qualify in most California cases.

Defendant absence from state

If the at-fault party leaves California after the injury, the SOL is typically tolled for the period of absence. Modern long-arm statutes and the increasing availability of service via the California insurance commissioner have narrowed this rule.

Fraudulent concealment

If the defendant actively concealed the cause of action, California courts can extend the SOL until the concealment is discovered or could have been discovered with reasonable diligence. Passive non-disclosure does not usually qualify.

Claims against California government entities

The California Tort Claims Act imposes pre-suit notice requirements on claims against state and municipal defendants. These notices are jurisdictional , failing to serve them on time, in the form required by statute, dismisses the case regardless of the SOL.

Comparative-fault rule that applies once you file on time

The statute of limitations decides whether you can sue. California's comparative-negligence rule then decides what you can collect.

California applies pure comparative negligence. California uses pure comparative negligence: a plaintiff can recover even if 99% at fault, but recovery is reduced by their percentage of fault. Authority: Li v. Yellow Cab Co. (1975).

Deeper breakdown: California comparative negligence

All California civil-injury deadlines at a glance

Claim typeDeadlineStatuteClock starts
Personal injury (negligence) 2 years Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 335.1 (PI) Date of injury
Medical malpractice 1 year Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 335.1 (PI) Discovery or treatment end
Wrongful death 2 years Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 335.1 (PI) Date of death
Property damage 3 years Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 335.1 (PI) Date of damage

California auto-insurance framework you will encounter

California is a pure at-fault (tort) state for car-accident claims. That means injured parties can sue the at-fault driver directly. The minimum liability coverage required under Cal. Veh. Code § 16056 is 15/30/5.

California does not mandate UM coverage but insurers must offer it (Cal. Ins. Code § 11580.2). Most policies include it at a minimum of 15/30.

California damage caps that affect what you can recover

California caps non-economic damages in medical-malpractice cases at $350,000. Punitive damages are uncapped. Authority: Cal. Civ. Code § 3333.2 (MICRA, raised by AB 35 effective 2023).

California statute-of-limitations FAQ

Does California extend the SOL if the at-fault driver leaves the state?

California tolls the running of the SOL while the defendant is absent from the state. The defense bears the burden of proving the dates of absence, and tolling typically does not apply to defendants who can be served via long-arm statute or through their California insurer.

What if the insurance company is still negotiating when the deadline approaches?

Insurance negotiations do not toll the statute. California courts have repeatedly held that an adjuster's willingness to talk settlement is not a waiver of the SOL defense. Plaintiffs' lawyers routinely file protective complaints in the final 30 days even if talks are ongoing.

Does filing a workers' compensation claim extend the personal-injury SOL?

No. A workers' compensation claim is a separate administrative remedy with its own deadlines. If a third party (not your employer) caused the injury, you must still file the civil personal-injury suit within the standard California SOL.

What is "tolling" and when does it apply in California?

Tolling pauses the clock. California recognizes tolling for minority, mental incapacity, defendant absence, and (in narrow cases) fraudulent concealment of the cause of action by the defendant.

If I was hit by a California-registered driver but the crash happened in another state, which SOL applies?

Choice-of-law principles generally apply the SOL of the state where the injury occurred (the lex loci delicti rule), but California courts also look at the borrowing statute and the parties' connections. Cross-state cases benefit from early counsel.

Can the SOL be extended by a written agreement with the defendant?

Yes, in limited circumstances. California permits tolling agreements between the parties that extend the deadline, but they must be in writing, signed by an authorized representative of each side, and entered before the original deadline expires.

Does sending a demand letter to the insurance company stop the clock?

No. Only proper filing of a civil complaint in a California court stops the SOL. Demand letters, pre-suit mediation, and adjuster negotiations have no legal effect on the statutory deadline.

Are there different deadlines for car accidents, slip-and-falls, and dog bites in California?

In most states the personal-injury SOL applies uniformly to negligence-based claims regardless of accident type. California does have separate deadlines for medical-malpractice, wrongful-death, and certain intentional-tort claims, addressed on dedicated pages.

Related California personal-injury topics

Statute of limitations in nearby states

Sources cited on this page

  1. California personal-injury statute: Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 335.1 (PI), § 340.5 (medmal). Primary authority for the 2-year deadline.
  2. Comparative-negligence rule: Li v. Yellow Cab Co. (1975). Establishes pure comparative negligence in California.
  3. Auto-insurance / financial-responsibility: Cal. Veh. Code § 16056. Minimum liability 15/30/5.
  4. Uninsured-motorist coverage: Cal. Ins. Code § 11580.2.
  5. Damage caps: Cal. Civ. Code § 3333.2 (MICRA, raised by AB 35 effective 2023).
  6. Court verification: Decisions of CA Sup. Ct., CA Ct. App., accessed via Cornell Legal Information Institute and the CourtListener PACER archive.

Last verified against primary sources on 2026-05-16.