Minors
Minor tolling in Connecticut preserves a child's right to sue until they are legally able to do so themselves. Parents can still file on the child's behalf during minority, but they are not required to , the clock waits.
The clock starts on the date of injury. The controlling statute is Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-584. Filing one day late dismisses the case with prejudice.
Under Connecticut law, a personal-injury cause of action does not exist forever. The legislature has set a fixed window , measured in years from the date of injury , within which a complaint must be filed in a Connecticut court of competent jurisdiction.
Connecticut applies the same 2-year limitations period to personal injury, medical malpractice, and wrongful-death claims (Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-584). Property-damage claims run separately, with a 2-year deadline.
The statute itself, Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-584, is the controlling authority. Interpretive decisions come from CT Sup. Ct., which has repeatedly enforced the deadline against late-filed plaintiffs.
The statute begins running on the date the injury occurred. Several Connecticut appellate decisions have emphasized that the clock is not tolled by ongoing medical treatment or by the plaintiff's subjective sense that the case can wait.
Under Connecticut's discovery doctrine, if an injury is not immediately apparent, the clock can be delayed until the plaintiff discovers , or, with reasonable diligence, should have discovered , both the harm and its connection to the defendant's conduct.
Filing late triggers an immediate motion to dismiss "with prejudice." That phrase matters: a dismissal with prejudice cannot be refiled. The same facts cannot be brought as a new case in a different court.
Minor tolling in Connecticut preserves a child's right to sue until they are legally able to do so themselves. Parents can still file on the child's behalf during minority, but they are not required to , the clock waits.
Connecticut courts have recognized tolling for plaintiffs whose mental condition prevents them from understanding or pursuing their legal rights. The burden of proof is on the plaintiff. Temporary impairment after the accident, such as pain medication or short hospitalizations, does not qualify in most Connecticut cases.
If the at-fault party leaves Connecticut after the injury, the SOL is typically tolled for the period of absence. Modern long-arm statutes and the increasing availability of service via the Connecticut insurance commissioner have narrowed this rule.
If the defendant actively concealed the cause of action, Connecticut courts can extend the SOL until the concealment is discovered or could have been discovered with reasonable diligence. Passive non-disclosure does not usually qualify.
Claims against Connecticut government entities require a written notice of claim served on the appropriate official within a fixed window after the injury. The Connecticut Attorney General's office or city/county attorney is typically the proper recipient.
Beating the SOL is necessary but not sufficient. A Connecticut jury will also be asked to apportion fault , and the result determines how much of your damages you actually recover.
Connecticut applies modified comparative fault (51% bar). Connecticut uses modified comparative fault with a 51% bar: plaintiff can recover only if less than 51% at fault. Authority: Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-572h.
| Claim type | Deadline | Statute | Clock starts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Personal injury (negligence) | 2 years | Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-584 | Date of injury |
| Medical malpractice | 2 years | Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-584 | Discovery or treatment end |
| Wrongful death | 2 years | Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-584 | Date of death |
| Property damage | 2 years | Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-584 | Date of damage |
Connecticut is a pure at-fault (tort) state for car-accident claims. That means injured parties can sue the at-fault driver directly. The minimum liability coverage required under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 14-112 is 25/50/25.
Connecticut requires UM coverage at a minimum of 25/50 (Conn. Gen. Stat. § 38a-336). Stacking treatment: allowed.
Connecticut does not cap non-economic damages in medical-malpractice cases. Punitive damages are limited per statute (limited to litigation costs). Authority: Hanford v. Plaza Packaging.
Connecticut tolls the running of the SOL while the defendant is absent from the state. The defense bears the burden of proving the dates of absence, and tolling typically does not apply to defendants who can be served via long-arm statute or through their Connecticut insurer.
Insurance negotiations do not toll the statute. Connecticut courts have repeatedly held that an adjuster's willingness to talk settlement is not a waiver of the SOL defense. Plaintiffs' lawyers routinely file protective complaints in the final 30 days even if talks are ongoing.
No. A workers' compensation claim is a separate administrative remedy with its own deadlines. If a third party (not your employer) caused the injury, you must still file the civil personal-injury suit within the standard Connecticut SOL.
Tolling pauses the clock. Connecticut recognizes tolling for minority, mental incapacity, defendant absence, and (in narrow cases) fraudulent concealment of the cause of action by the defendant.
Choice-of-law principles generally apply the SOL of the state where the injury occurred (the lex loci delicti rule), but Connecticut courts also look at the borrowing statute and the parties' connections. Cross-state cases benefit from early counsel.
Yes, in limited circumstances. Connecticut permits tolling agreements between the parties that extend the deadline, but they must be in writing, signed by an authorized representative of each side, and entered before the original deadline expires.
No. Only proper filing of a civil complaint in a Connecticut court stops the SOL. Demand letters, pre-suit mediation, and adjuster negotiations have no legal effect on the statutory deadline.
In most states the personal-injury SOL applies uniformly to negligence-based claims regardless of accident type. Connecticut does have separate deadlines for medical-malpractice, wrongful-death, and certain intentional-tort claims, addressed on dedicated pages.
Last verified against primary sources on 2026-05-16.