Free personal-injury tools that show their work.
Every tool shares the same contract: an explainable result, a "Show my reasoning" breakdown of how the AI arrived at the answer, a citation to the controlling statute or case, the model used, and a timestamp of the last source verification. No phone gate, no email gate, no legal-advice claim.
The shared AI contract
Case Value AI
Estimate your personal-injury settlement range, cited to real PACER cases.
SOL Countdown
Live filing-deadline countdown for every U.S. state, with tolling exceptions.
Demand Letter Generator
Draft a settlement demand letter using your case facts and the at-fault carrier's lowball patterns.
Damages Estimator
Decompose your case value into medical specials, lost wages, pain and suffering, and future damages.
Insurance Playbook
What to expect from each major insurer, scripted by adjuster behavior pattern.
Comparable Cases
5,247 real PACER cases, searchable by jurisdiction, injury, and settlement range.
Lawyer Cost Calculator
Estimate what a contingency-fee attorney will keep from your settlement, and what you take home.
Adjuster Scripts
What to say when the adjuster says X. Insurer-specific scripts for the most common adjuster objections.
Government Claim Notice
Find the exact notice deadline and form to file when a state or city government entity caused your injury.
Jurisdiction Picker
Which court should you file in? State vs. federal, county vs. county, removal risk.
Settlement Tracker
Anonymous, opt-in settlement database. Submit your settled case to help future plaintiffs price theirs.
Statute Search
Search every U.S. personal-injury statute by keyword. Citations to primary law on every result.
How we built these tools
Every tool on this page was built with the same operating principle: AI for the harder analytical steps, deterministic algorithms for the calculations, primary-source data (statutes, court records, state DOI filings) for the facts. The combination is more accurate than either an AI-only approach or a calculator-only approach because each layer catches the other's failure modes.
AI-only tools hallucinate citations and over-confidently extrapolate. Calculator-only tools cannot interpret the user's fact pattern. The hybrid model , deterministic baseline plus AI adjustment plus primary-source verification , is the right answer for personal-injury intelligence specifically because the underlying domain is heavily rule-based but the rules require interpretation against messy facts.
The reasoning trace published with every AI output is not a marketing artifact. It is the actual scratch pad the model used. Readers can verify that the model considered the right factors, weighted them in a defensible way, and reached a conclusion consistent with the primary sources cited.
Composing the tools for a complete case workflow
The tools work better in combination than individually. A representative end-to-end workflow goes like this: immediately after the injury, run SOL Countdown to lock in the filing-deadline date. While medical treatment is ongoing, save SOL Countdown reminders, use Statute Search to read the controlling personal-injury statute, and use the Jurisdiction Picker to plan which court the eventual suit should be filed in. Once treatment is reaching maximum medical improvement, use Damages Estimator to build the bucket-by-bucket damages computation and Case Value AI to anchor the settlement range against comparable PACER cases.
At demand-package time, use Comparable Cases to pull the five to ten closest fact-pattern matches; use Demand Letter Generator to draft a carrier-specific letter; use Insurance Playbook to anticipate the carrier's objections and pre-empt them in the package. When the carrier offers a settlement, use Lawyer Cost Calculator to project the net recovery after fees and liens. Once the case settles, use Settlement Tracker to contribute the anonymized data back to the public dataset.
Most plaintiffs will use a subset of the tools rather than all twelve, and that is fine. The tools are modular by design: each produces a useful output by itself and a more useful output in combination with others. Browse the full list and pick the ones that match your case phase and your specific decision points.
The information asymmetry these tools are designed to address
For two decades, insurance carriers have used proprietary analytics products (Colossus, Mitchell ClaimIQ, ColossusEnhanced) that systematically value personal-injury claims using millions of historical settlements as training data. These products give carriers a structural information advantage in every personal-injury negotiation. Plaintiffs and their counsel , especially in solo and small-firm practices , have not had access to an equivalent toolkit.
The 12 tools on this site exist to close part of that information gap. Case Value AI uses comparable-case data from CourtListener PACER to produce settlement-range estimates anchored in real outcomes, not the carrier's proprietary reserves. Damages Estimator decomposes a case into the same five categories carriers use, with transparent multipliers and present-value adjustments. The Insurance Playbook documents the publicly observable parts of each major carrier's claim-handling pattern. Adjuster Scripts provide attorney-tone responses to the most common adjuster tactics. None of these tools matches what the carriers have privately, but they do substantially close the gap.
Plaintiffs who use these tools in combination , and who pair the output with experienced personal-injury counsel , recover more than plaintiffs who rely on the carrier's "fair offer" representation. That recovery delta is the operating thesis of the site. The tools are free because the information they surface should not be paywalled or reserved for the side with the most claim volume.
What this site is not
These tools are informational only. They do not provide legal advice. They do not establish an attorney-client relationship. They are designed to help injured people understand the framework of their case , the deadlines, the dollar ranges, the procedural traps , so the conversation with an attorney is more productive, not so the attorney conversation is replaced.
We do not refer cases to specific attorneys. We do not accept referral fees from attorneys. We do not sell your information to claims-buyer firms. The "Find an attorney" page lists state bar referral services, not paid placements.