Minors
Children injured in Arizona get a tolling rule: the statute does not begin running until the minor reaches the age of majority. This means a five-year-old injured in a car accident generally has until age 18 + the standard SOL years to file.
The clock starts on the date of injury. The controlling statute is Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-542. Filing one day late dismisses the case with prejudice.
Personal-injury cases in Arizona live or die by the calendar. The statute of limitations is the single most aggressive procedural defense available to insurers and defense attorneys, and they raise it the moment a complaint is filed even a day late.
Arizona applies the same 2-year limitations period to personal injury, medical malpractice, and wrongful-death claims (Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-542). Property-damage claims run separately, with a 2-year deadline.
The statute itself, Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-542, is the controlling authority. Interpretive decisions come from AZ Sup. Ct., which has repeatedly enforced the deadline against late-filed plaintiffs.
Accrual in Arizona means the date you sustained the injury. The fact that you settled with the at-fault driver's insurer or filed a PIP claim does not extend the period. Only a proper civil complaint stops the clock.
The discovery rule in Arizona is narrowly applied. Courts generally require evidence that the injury was inherently undiscoverable, not merely that the plaintiff was unaware. Routine soft-tissue injuries from a car accident almost never qualify.
A late-filed complaint in Arizona is dismissed on the pleadings. The court does not hear evidence, does not weigh fault, does not consider damages. The motion is purely procedural and almost never denied.
Children injured in Arizona get a tolling rule: the statute does not begin running until the minor reaches the age of majority. This means a five-year-old injured in a car accident generally has until age 18 + the standard SOL years to file.
Arizona courts have recognized tolling for plaintiffs whose mental condition prevents them from understanding or pursuing their legal rights. The burden of proof is on the plaintiff. Temporary impairment after the accident, such as pain medication or short hospitalizations, does not qualify in most Arizona cases.
If the at-fault party leaves Arizona after the injury, the SOL is typically tolled for the period of absence. Modern long-arm statutes and the increasing availability of service via the Arizona insurance commissioner have narrowed this rule.
If the defendant actively concealed the cause of action, Arizona courts can extend the SOL until the concealment is discovered or could have been discovered with reasonable diligence. Passive non-disclosure does not usually qualify.
If your injury was caused by a Arizona state or local government entity , a city bus, a police officer, a public-school employee , you generally must file a separate "notice of claim" within a much shorter window (typically 60 to 180 days) BEFORE filing a civil suit. Missing the notice deadline bars the lawsuit even if the longer SOL has not yet expired.
Filing on time gets you into court. Winning at trial is a separate question, and Arizona's comparative-fault rule is the next major hurdle.
Arizona applies pure comparative negligence. Arizona uses pure comparative negligence: recovery is reduced by the plaintiff's percentage of fault. Authority: Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-2505.
| Claim type | Deadline | Statute | Clock starts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Personal injury (negligence) | 2 years | Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-542 | Date of injury |
| Medical malpractice | 2 years | Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-542 | Discovery or treatment end |
| Wrongful death | 2 years | Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-542 | Date of death |
| Property damage | 2 years | Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-542 | Date of damage |
Arizona is a pure at-fault (tort) state for car-accident claims. That means injured parties can sue the at-fault driver directly. The minimum liability coverage required under Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 28-4009 is 25/50/15.
Arizona requires UM coverage at a minimum of 25/50 (Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 20-259.01). Stacking treatment: allowed.
Arizona does not cap non-economic damages in medical-malpractice cases. Punitive damages are uncapped. Authority: Ariz. Const. art. II, § 31 , caps prohibited.
Arizona tolls the running of the SOL while the defendant is absent from the state. The defense bears the burden of proving the dates of absence, and tolling typically does not apply to defendants who can be served via long-arm statute or through their Arizona insurer.
Insurance negotiations do not toll the statute. Arizona courts have repeatedly held that an adjuster's willingness to talk settlement is not a waiver of the SOL defense. Plaintiffs' lawyers routinely file protective complaints in the final 30 days even if talks are ongoing.
No. A workers' compensation claim is a separate administrative remedy with its own deadlines. If a third party (not your employer) caused the injury, you must still file the civil personal-injury suit within the standard Arizona SOL.
Tolling pauses the clock. Arizona recognizes tolling for minority, mental incapacity, defendant absence, and (in narrow cases) fraudulent concealment of the cause of action by the defendant.
Choice-of-law principles generally apply the SOL of the state where the injury occurred (the lex loci delicti rule), but Arizona courts also look at the borrowing statute and the parties' connections. Cross-state cases benefit from early counsel.
Yes, in limited circumstances. Arizona permits tolling agreements between the parties that extend the deadline, but they must be in writing, signed by an authorized representative of each side, and entered before the original deadline expires.
No. Only proper filing of a civil complaint in a Arizona court stops the SOL. Demand letters, pre-suit mediation, and adjuster negotiations have no legal effect on the statutory deadline.
In most states the personal-injury SOL applies uniformly to negligence-based claims regardless of accident type. Arizona does have separate deadlines for medical-malpractice, wrongful-death, and certain intentional-tort claims, addressed on dedicated pages.
Last verified against primary sources on 2026-05-16.