Minors
Minor tolling in Nevada preserves a child's right to sue until they are legally able to do so themselves. Parents can still file on the child's behalf during minority, but they are not required to , the clock waits.
The clock starts on the date of injury. The controlling statute is Nev. Rev. Stat. § 11.190. Filing one day late dismisses the case with prejudice.
Nevada's civil-procedure code sets one of the strictest deadlines in tort litigation: the personal-injury statute of limitations. Miss it, and the doctrine of laches plus the statute combine to extinguish your claim permanently.
Nevada's personal-injury deadline is 2 years from the date of injury (Nev. Rev. Stat. § 11.190). Medical-malpractice claims run separately at 3 years, often with a discovery-rule trigger. Property-damage claims have a 3-year deadline.
The statute itself, Nev. Rev. Stat. § 11.190, is the controlling authority. Interpretive decisions come from NV Sup. Ct., which has repeatedly enforced the deadline against late-filed plaintiffs.
The deadline runs from the date the injury "accrued" , usually the date of the accident itself. Under Nevada case law, a cause of action accrues at the moment the plaintiff suffers a legally compensable harm, even if the full extent of the injury is not yet known.
Under Nevada's discovery doctrine, if an injury is not immediately apparent, the clock can be delayed until the plaintiff discovers , or, with reasonable diligence, should have discovered , both the harm and its connection to the defendant's conduct.
The consequence of filing one day late is the same as filing one year late , total bar. Nevada courts have repeatedly rejected "near miss" equitable arguments. If the deadline is two years and you file on day 731, the case is dead.
Minor tolling in Nevada preserves a child's right to sue until they are legally able to do so themselves. Parents can still file on the child's behalf during minority, but they are not required to , the clock waits.
Nevada courts have recognized tolling for plaintiffs whose mental condition prevents them from understanding or pursuing their legal rights. The burden of proof is on the plaintiff. Temporary impairment after the accident, such as pain medication or short hospitalizations, does not qualify in most Nevada cases.
If the at-fault party leaves Nevada after the injury, the SOL is typically tolled for the period of absence. Modern long-arm statutes and the increasing availability of service via the Nevada insurance commissioner have narrowed this rule.
If the defendant actively concealed the cause of action, Nevada courts can extend the SOL until the concealment is discovered or could have been discovered with reasonable diligence. Passive non-disclosure does not usually qualify.
Claims against Nevada government entities require a written notice of claim served on the appropriate official within a fixed window after the injury. The Nevada Attorney General's office or city/county attorney is typically the proper recipient.
Once your complaint is filed within the deadline, the case moves to the merits. Nevada jurors apply the state's comparative-fault doctrine to allocate responsibility, and that allocation drives the final award.
Nevada applies modified comparative fault (51% bar). Nevada uses modified comparative fault with 51% bar. Authority: Nev. Rev. Stat. § 41.141.
| Claim type | Deadline | Statute | Clock starts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Personal injury (negligence) | 2 years | Nev. Rev. Stat. § 11.190 | Date of injury |
| Medical malpractice | 3 years | Nev. Rev. Stat. § 11.190 | Discovery or treatment end |
| Wrongful death | 2 years | Nev. Rev. Stat. § 11.190 | Date of death |
| Property damage | 3 years | Nev. Rev. Stat. § 11.190 | Date of damage |
Nevada is a pure at-fault (tort) state for car-accident claims. That means injured parties can sue the at-fault driver directly. The minimum liability coverage required under Nev. Rev. Stat. § 485.185 is 25/50/20.
Nevada does not mandate UM coverage but insurers must offer it (Nev. Rev. Stat. § 687B.145). Most policies include it at a minimum of undefined.
Nevada caps non-economic damages in medical-malpractice cases at $350,000. Punitive damages are limited per statute ($300K or 3x compensatory). Authority: Nev. Rev. Stat. § 41A.035.
Nevada tolls the running of the SOL while the defendant is absent from the state. The defense bears the burden of proving the dates of absence, and tolling typically does not apply to defendants who can be served via long-arm statute or through their Nevada insurer.
Insurance negotiations do not toll the statute. Nevada courts have repeatedly held that an adjuster's willingness to talk settlement is not a waiver of the SOL defense. Plaintiffs' lawyers routinely file protective complaints in the final 30 days even if talks are ongoing.
No. A workers' compensation claim is a separate administrative remedy with its own deadlines. If a third party (not your employer) caused the injury, you must still file the civil personal-injury suit within the standard Nevada SOL.
Tolling pauses the clock. Nevada recognizes tolling for minority, mental incapacity, defendant absence, and (in narrow cases) fraudulent concealment of the cause of action by the defendant.
Choice-of-law principles generally apply the SOL of the state where the injury occurred (the lex loci delicti rule), but Nevada courts also look at the borrowing statute and the parties' connections. Cross-state cases benefit from early counsel.
Yes, in limited circumstances. Nevada permits tolling agreements between the parties that extend the deadline, but they must be in writing, signed by an authorized representative of each side, and entered before the original deadline expires.
No. Only proper filing of a civil complaint in a Nevada court stops the SOL. Demand letters, pre-suit mediation, and adjuster negotiations have no legal effect on the statutory deadline.
In most states the personal-injury SOL applies uniformly to negligence-based claims regardless of accident type. Nevada does have separate deadlines for medical-malpractice, wrongful-death, and certain intentional-tort claims, addressed on dedicated pages.
Last verified against primary sources on 2026-05-16.